Is Polybius accurate?
Throughout his books, Polybius has a lot to say about the correct way to write history, and it clear that he wanted to ‘get back to Thucydides’; he is generally regarded therefore – as ancient historians go – as a ‘reliable’ source. What he calls ‘digressions’ to discuss geography, art, science and moral issues.
Did Rome ever capture Hannibal?
In 219 BC Hannibal besieged, captured and sacked the pro-Roman city of Saguntum, prompting a Roman declaration of war on Carthage in spring 218 BC….Second Punic War.
|Date||Spring 218 – 201 BC (17 years)|
|Territorial changes||Roman conquest of Carthaginian Iberia|
How many Romans died to Hannibal?
As a result, the Roman army was hemmed in with no means of escape. Due to these brilliant tactics, Hannibal managed to surround and destroy all but a small remnant of his enemy, despite his own inferior numbers. Depending upon the source, it is estimated that 50,000–70,000 Romans were killed or captured.
Is Polybius pro Roman?
Despite his alleged pro-Roman bias, he made an effort to write objectively. His writing reveals the range of human emotion, enabling readers to think and feel their way into the narrative. People who look to history to learn pragmatic and moral lessons are likely to regard Polybius’s historiography with appreciation.
Who was Polybius audience?
Peter Green advises that Polybius was chronicling Roman history for a Greek audience, to justify what he believed to be the inevitability of Roman rule.
What are Miller’s arguments against those who claim that the Roman republic was a top down system?
Answer: Explanation: Millar’s claim against those who claim that the Roman Republic was a “top down” system was that the power of the people upheld the political process in the Roman Political System. Moreover, the Roman Republic used Democracy to give more freedom and power to people through elections.
What did Polybius find so admirable about the government of the Roman Republic?
Polybius sought to answer this question in his book, The Histories. Polybius believed that Rome’s constitution was effective for two reasons. Firstly, the constitution adapted to suit human nature. Secondly, it prevented what he referred to as “anacyclosis,” a cyclical theory of political evolution and decay.