Who is the better moral philosopher Plato or Aristotle?

Who is the better moral philosopher Plato or Aristotle?

Though many more of Plato’s works survived the centuries, Aristotle’s contributions have arguably been more influential, particularly when it comes to science and logical reasoning. While both philosophers’ works are considered less theoretically valuable in modern times, they continue to have great historical value.

What does Socrates believe about morality?

Socrates was opposed to the moral relativism of the Sophists. He believed that there were objective moral standards; that they could be discovered; that there were right and wrong answers to moral questions that went beyond mere opinion and popular sentiment.

Why does Socrates think we should be moral?

We should thus be moral because not to do so is to choose not to be harmoniously integrated with oneself. For Socrates, virtue is the strength of character that guarantees one’s happiness. Immoral acts undermine our character insofar as they weaken our future ability to act freely and courageously.

Why is moral character important?

Moral character is the foundation of personal acceptance and growth, healthy relationships and success. Without it, our kids will have great difficulty achieving true peace of mind, making morally-driven decisions, building solid, long-lasting relationships or finding true success in their endeavors or career.

What is ethics by Plato?

Like most other ancient philosophers, Plato maintains a virtue-based eudaemonistic conception of ethics. That is to say, happiness or well-being (eudaimonia) is the highest aim of moral thought and conduct, and the virtues (aretê: ‘excellence’) are the requisite skills and dispositions needed to attain it.

What is moral life according to Plato?

Plato defined good life through practice of reasonable restraint by individual and civic duty (concept of EUDAIMONIA).Individual needs to achieve highest level of moral perfection to be happy.

What is Plato’s view on morality?

How is Socrates finally able to answer the question ‘is Justice a virtue?

Socrates is finally close to answering the question after he characterizes justice as a personal virtue at the end of Book Four, but he is interrupted and challenged to defend some of the more controversial features of the good city he has sketched.

Is Aristotle’s legal philosophy difficult to understand?

Consequently, the works of Aristotle as we now have them raise many difficulties. This applies to the major works that contain Aristotle’s legal philosophy: the Politics, the Nicomachean Ethics, and the Rhetoric.

Why does Socrates sketch an account of a good city?

To answer the question, Socrates takes a long way around, sketching an account of a good city on the grounds that a good city would be just and that defining justice as a virtue of a city would help to define justice as a virtue of a human being.

How does Socrates use the Republic to reflect on politics?

Yet because Socrates links his discussion of personal justice to an account of justice in the city and makes claims about how good and bad cities are arranged, the Republic sustains reflections on political questions, as well. Not that ethics and politics exhaust the concerns of the Republic.