What questions did the Milgram experiment raise?

What questions did the Milgram experiment raise?

The experiments began in July 1961, a year after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiment to answer the question: Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?” (Milgram, 1974).

How did critics criticize the validity of his results in the Milgram experiment?

Milgram’s study has been criticised for lacking ecological validity because the task is artificial – in real life, teachers are not asked to deliver electric shocks to learners. One of the main critics is Australian psychologist Gina Perry, who wrote a book debunking Milgram called Behind The Shock Machine (2012).

What were the criticisms of Milgram’s research?

The modern criticisms include: When a participant hesitated in applying electric shocks, the actor playing the role of experimenter was meant to stick to a script of four escalating verbal “prods”. In fact, he frequently improvised, inventing his own terms and means of persuasion.

How is the Milgram study relevant today?

Summary: A replication of one of the most widely known obedience studies, the Stanley Milgram experiment, shows that even today, people are still willing to harm others in pursuit of obeying authority. While no shocks were actually delivered in any of the experiments, the participants believed them to be real.

Why was the Milgram study unethical?

The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people. The participants were unaware that the learner was an associate of Milgram’s. However, Milgram argued that deception was necessary to produce the desired outcomes of the experiment.

What was ethical wrong with the Milgram experiment generate?

The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows: deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal. The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.