What is the difference between the military theories of Jomini and Clausewitz?

What is the difference between the military theories of Jomini and Clausewitz?

Clausewitz rose through the military rank and file with various combat and staff duties. This career path exposed him to strategic planning and political-military decisions at the highest level. In contrast, Jomini never held military command and subsequently spent his life in search of recognition he felt he deserved.

What are the main differences between Clausewitz and Sun Tzu’s view of strategy?

One apparent difference between the two thinkers is that Clausewitz tends to focus more on the “lower” tactical levels of war, while Sun Tzu also incorporates the “higher” strategic levels of war into his theory (Handel, 2005, p.

What is Clausewitz’s theory of war?

In On War, Clausewitz sees all wars as the sum of decisions, actions, and reactions in an uncertain and dangerous context, and also as a socio-political phenomenon. He also stressed the complex nature of war, which encompasses both the socio-political and the operational and stresses the primacy of state policy.

How does Jomini define war?

– Strategy decides where to act, Logistics brings troops to designated point, Grand Tactics is the employment of forces against the decisive point. – Strategy hinges upon identifying the decisive points in the theater of war and then concentrating mass against that point and enemy LOCs.

What reasons does jomini provide to as why governments go to war?

to increase the influence and power of the state by acquisitions of territory; to defend the threatened independence of the state; to avenge insulted honor; or. from a mania for conquest.”

What is Clausewitz Trinity?

Clausewitz, in his own words, describes the trinity as consisting of “primordial violence, hatred, and enmity, which are to be regarded as a blind natural force; of the play of chance and probability within which the creative spirit is free to roam; and of its element of subordination, as an instrument of policy, which …

Would Sun Tzu agree with Clausewitz?

He blends the army into a harmonious entity and encamps it.” Clausewitz would also agree with Sun Tzu on the need for military “genius” in warfare given he devoted an entire chapter early on in his book on the subject. This is another example of consistency between the two military theorists.

Is Clausewitz’s On War relevant to contemporary warfare?

In conclusion, this paper has argued that Clausewitz’s strategy provides a conceptual link between ends and means during peacetime and during war, and his theory of war is still relevant to contemporary strategists.

What are the clausewitzian trinities and how do they influence war?

In Prussian theorist Carl von Clausewitz’s seminal military treatise, On War, he introduced the “paradoxical trinity.”[1] The trinity is a useful tool to conceptualize the chaos of war and has been described as the tension between three fundamental elements of war: the government, the people, and the army.

What was the period of Antoine Henri Jomini?

Antoine-Henri Baron de Jomini (b. 1779–d. 1869) has become one of the most influential military theorists of the modern age. His principles, which at some point formed the basis for military education, have influenced teaching in European and North American military academies through the 19th century.

What is the primary element of Clausewitzian analysis?

The elements of the primary trinity are thus (1) passion and violence, (2) chance and probability, and (3) rational purpose; non-material or non-tangible factors, each of which Clausewitz went on to associate with the people, the military, and the government, respectively.

Who is the greatest strategist?

1. Ghengis Khan. Genghis Khan conquered more than twice as much as any other man in history.
2. Hannibal. Hannibal might be one of the top strategists of all time.
3. Scipio Africanus.
4. John Boyd.
5. Napoleon.
6. “Desert Fox” Erwin Rommel.
7. Robert Moses.
8. William Tecumseh Sherman.

What is the difference between Jomini and Clausewitz’s ideas on war?

Jomini proposes (IIRC) that war can be seen as a duel between two men, whereas Clausewitz refuses that notion. War is infinetly more complicated. The other main difference is, that Jomini is a proponent of offensive warfare, whereas Clausewitz is a proponent of defensive.

What was Clausewitz’s philosophy of war?

While not especially strict in adherence to a particular philosophy, Clausewitz tended towards German idealism because of his exposure to Johann Gottfried Kiesewetter and G.W.F Hegel. The study of war through this lens is obvious in Clausewitz’s writing style. Clausewitz shows his work constantly.

What is the relationship between Jomini and Warwar?

War to Jomini was neat and orderly, heroic even. His writing reflects both his desire for command and the systematic nature of his staff officer experience. While both men draw heavily on their early life experiences, other events and personalities contributed to the differences in their theoretical approaches and conclusions.

How did the younger Mahan react to Clausewitz?

The younger Mahan eventually became familiar with Clausewitz,*2 calling him “one of the first of authorities.”