Table of Contents
What did the Rolling Stones think of the Beatles?
In a 2011 interview with the Radio Times, McCartney asserted that the Stones were jealous of the Beatles’ vocal abilities: “I talked to Keith Richards a couple of years ago, and his take on it was: ‘Man, you were lucky, you guys, you had four lead singers,’ whereas The Rolling Stones only had one,” he said.
What is the most interesting fact about the Beatles?
15 interesting facts about The Beatles Members
- The Beatles got the idea for their name from Buddy Holly and The Crickets.
- John Lennon’s father was absent for much of his early life but showed up when his son became famous.
- Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr were not the original rhythm section.
Who started first Beatles or Stones?
Answer: The Beatles were officially formed in Liverpool in 1960, whilst The Rolling Stones were formed in London in 1962.
What was unusual about the Beatles?
None of the Beatles could read music. They could play the guitar, piano, and drums and write lyrics, but they never learned to read music. The Beatles formed in Liverpool in 1960, and their most famous lineup consisted of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr.
Did the Stones hate the Beatles?
As the Stones begun dominating British and later American charts the two bands struck up a friendly rivalry. “We went through some pretty strange times,” Mick Jagger shared while inducting the Beatles into the Rock And Roll Hall of Fame in 1988.
Who sold more records the Beatles or the Stones?
| ARTIST | COMBINED SALES TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BEATLES | 22.1 MILLION |
| 2 | QUEEN | 12.8 MILLION |
| 3 | ABBA | 11.3 MILLION |
| 4 | ROLLING STONES | 10.1 MILLION |
Did John Lennon ever play with The Rolling Stones?
On this day John Lennon and Yoko Ono were among guests performing on The Rolling Stones’ television spectacular, Rock And Roll Circus. Lennon attended neither, but may have joined rehearsals at 8 and 9 December at the Londonderry House Hotel. …
What’s the truth about the Beatles vs Stones debate?
In Beatles Vs. Stones (Simon & Schuster, 2013), John McMillian gets to the truth behind the ultimate rock ‘n’ roll debate. •The Beatles and the Stones weren’t really “rivals” – that was just a media myth, concocted by sensationalizing journalists and naïve teenyboppers. In fact, the Beatles and the Stones were good friends.
Why did John Lennon hate the Beatles so much?
In October 1963, John Lennon fulminated in Melody Maker magazine about groups that appeared to be “copying” the Beatles. He seemed particularly aggrieved at a newer, London-based rhythm & blues group, which was made up at least partly of students, whose members refused to attribute their hairstyles to the Beatles’ influence.
Were the Beatles and the stones good friends?
In fact, the Beatles and the Stones were good friends. It would be far more accurate to say that during most of the ’60s, the Beatles and the Stones were both friends and rivals. They clearly struck up a rapport, but that never stopped them from trying to outperform each other whenever and however they could.
Do the Beatles and the Rolling Stones want to burn down your town?
In the 1960s, the two biggest bands in the world — the lovable Beatles and the bad-boy Rolling Stones—waged an epic battle. “The Beatles want to hold your hand,” wrote Tom Wolfe, “but the Stones want to burn down your town.”