How Good Is Wikipedia as a source?

How Good Is Wikipedia as a source?

The online encyclopedia does not consider itself to be a reliable source and discourages readers from using it in academic or research settings. Researchers, teachers, journalists, and public officials do not regard Wikipedia as a reliable source.

Can you use Wiki as a reference?

The answer from Wikipedia is clear: at least in research projects, “you probably shouldn’t be citing Wikipedia”. Well, Wikipedia, like other encyclopedias and handbooks, is a tertiary source. Tertiary sources are those that take their information from other primary and secondary sources.

Why Wikipedia is not reliable Quora?

It is because anyone can edit a wiki page. This means that if some jerk, or kid was bored and wanted to pose lies as facts for some reason, they could. Therefore, you can’t trust the information 100\% of the time. Also, people make errors all the time, so even information in print can be wrong.

Is Wikipedia an academic source?

Wikipedia – Academic Use Wikipedia is not considered a credible source. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from students to professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything.

What is one reason that you should not use Wikipedia as a source?

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because, as a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong.

Why you Cannot use Wikipedia as an academic source?

However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered unacceptable, because Wikipedia is not considered a credible or authoritative source. This is especially true considering anyone can edit the information given at any time, and although most errors are immediately fixed, some errors maintain unnoticed.