Table of Contents
Can a reviewer reject a paper?
It is up to the editor whether to accept or reject. The reviewers only make recommendations. Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper.
When should you decline a review?
If you can’t give a paper the attention it deserves, or your review is going to be late (predictably, not because of unforeseen things), then you should probably decline to review it. You’re not doing you, the authors, or the editor any favors by making them chase you down for months to get a review.
Why do peer reviewers decline to review?
Reviewers decline review invitations for various reasons. In most cases, they are either too busy with their work or they have already taken up other reviews. Another possible reason for declining a review could be if the reviewer is not very comfortable with the topic or if he/she has a potential conflict of interest.
How do I disagree with a reviewer?
It is absolutely fine to disagree with a reviewer’s comment. You can send a point-by-point response to the editor explaining why you disagree with the reviewer’s suggestion. Make sure your response is backed by supporting evidence. If your viewpoint is justified, the editor will definitely consider it.
How do you politely reject a review?
I sometimes debate if I should give a kind (albeit only somewhat truthful) reason like “I’m currently backed up with review requests and am afraid I can’t accept your request at this time.” Or should I be more honest and state the real reason: “I’m only mildly interested in reading your book,” “I don’t know if your …
What does a scientific reviewer do?
Reviewers: ensure the rigorous standards of the scientific process by taking part in the peer-review system. uphold the integrity of the journal by identifying invalid research, and helping to maintain the quality of the journal. fulfil a sense of obligation to the community and their own area of research.
Is peer reviewing research papers prior to publication ethical or unethical?
Peer review is found to be intrinsically and structurally unethical, as presently implemented. All the major ethical failings of peer review are identified. A set of principles is proposed, on how to construct an ethical peer review system, for journals. An ideal, ethical journal is outlined, as an exemplar.
How do I reject a review request?
This also seems very simple: just reply on time saying that you can’t do the review, and if you know someone who would be suitable, scientifically, please let editorial know 🙂 Should you also give an opinion on the paper that you are declining to review? Some do.
Unavailable is for people who don´t dare to decline openly. “Declined” might mean “I don’t think I know enough to do a good job” or “I can’t be objective because my best friend/worst enemy/former spouse is one of the authors”. Unavailable would make way more sense if they let you say why!