How effective was a suit of Armour?
Effect on weapon development Plate armour was virtually invulnerable to sword slashes. It also protected the wearer well against spear or pike thrusts and provided decent defense against blunt trauma. The evolution of plate armour also triggered developments in the design of offensive weapons.
Is chainmail armor good in real life?
Chainmail was indeed very effective against perf/sev attacks. Where it fell somewhat short was in protecting against blunt force trauma.
What are the advantages of plate-armored armor?
The wearer remained highly agile and could jump, run and otherwise move freely as the weight of the armour was spread evenly throughout the body. The armour was articulated and covered a man’s entire body completely from neck to toe. In the 15th and 16th centuries plate-armored soldiers were the nucleus of every army.
How do you get through plate armor?
Generally underneath plate armor, you have an arming garment, which is padded, and in some cases, you have a full shirt of mail (chainmail) armor underneath plate armor. Maybe you got lucky and penetrated the plate armor, but you still have to get through padded linen and mail armor.
What is the most effective weapon against armor?
One type of sword, the Estoc, was made particularly for fighting against men in plate armour. It has very slight edges and a thick, narrow cross-section – its ‘blade’ is essentially a long awl, and it has a very strong point. Here is an example The most effective weapon against armour (after 1450 or so) is a gun.
When did plate armor become popular in Europe?
In Europe, plate armour reached its peak in the late 15th and early 16th centuries. The full suit of armour, also referred to as a panoply, is thus a feature of the very end of the Middle Ages and of the Renaissance period.