Table of Contents
- 1 Who investigates research misconduct?
- 2 When scientific misconduct is suspected what actions should an individual take Choose all that apply?
- 3 How do you correct research misconduct?
- 4 What is the first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation?
- 5 How you should report a scientific misconduct?
- 6 Which one is not a goal of the regulations for dealing with research misconduct?
Who investigates research misconduct?
It is the responsibility of each Investigator who participates in research at the NIH, no matter what their career stage, to maintain exemplary standard of intellectual honesty in formulating or conducting research and to report any suspected research misconduct to the NIH Agency Research Integrity Officer (ARIO).
When scientific misconduct is suspected what actions should an individual take Choose all that apply?
1. Individual report
- Review any evidence you have to make sure you haven’t misunderstood anything.
- Protect your evidence.
- Report your suspicions to the appropriate authority (e.g. the RIO) and/or your mentor.
- Consult with respected and trusted colleagues if you have doubts about reporting.
- Maintain confidentiality.
How do you know if data is fabricated?
It is considered to be “the most random digit of a number,” which means that that the numbers that make up a data set should be uniformly distributed as in a lottery. Since the rightmost digits in each study should be unpredictable, the appearance of any patterns is a reason to suspect data fabrication.
How do you correct research misconduct?
Strategies to Support Research Integrity
- Ensure policies governing academic research not only are in place, but are followed.
- Set standards for supervision of all testing.
- Enforce expectations for process rigor.
- Communicate expectations for accurate accounting of time spent on research activities.
What is the first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation?
The inquiry is generally the first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation.
What happens if a researcher violates a code of ethics?
The definition of misconduct can also extend to breaches of confidentiality and authorship/publication violations. Whistleblowers, or those reporting the misconduct, are obligated to act, yet may face serious consequences, such as reduction in research support, ostracism, lawsuits or termination.
How you should report a scientific misconduct?
Reporting Scientific Misconduct If a reader believes that there could be an ethical problem with a published manuscript, the first step would be to contact the editors of the journal where it appeared. Editors must take all allegations of misconduct seriously and have the responsibility to look into the case.
Which one is not a goal of the regulations for dealing with research misconduct?
The goals of these policies are laid out in order to curb the misbehavior in the research and prevent false results or fake results in research. Defining penalties for misconduct in research is not one of the goal 42 CFR 50 subpart A, the power of defining penalties rests with the Office of Research Integrity.
How common is data fabrication?
On average, across the surveys, around 2\% of scientists admitted they had “fabricated” (made up), “falsified” or “altered” data to “improve the outcome” at least once, and up to 34\% admitted to other questionable research practices including “failing to present data that contradict one’s own previous research” and ” …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHPKWjTmDEU